Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Walter Kozlowski (Telstra)

Absent (TSC)

  1. Al Morton  (AT&T)
  2. Beth Cohen (Verizon)
  3. Cedric Ollivier (Orange)
  4. Frank BrocknersGeorg Kunz (CiscoEricsson)
  5. Sridhar RaoTrevor Cooper (SpirentIntel)
  6. Ahmed El SawafSridhar Rao  (STCSpirent)
  7. Trevor CooperUlrich Kleber (IntelHuawei)
  8. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
  9. Riccardo Gasparetto Stori
  10. Gergely Csatari (Nokia)
  11. Emma Foley (Red Hat)
  12. Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)
  13. Riccardo Gasparetto Stori
  14. Beth Cohen (Verizon)
  15. Jie Niu (China Mobile)

Absent (TSC)

  1. Frank Brockners (Cisco)
  2. Ahmed El Sawaf (STC)

Other Attendees 

  1. Scot Steele (Microsoft)
  2. Pankaj Goyal(Microsoft)
  3. David McBride (LFN)
  4. Sandra Jackson (LFN)

Agenda

TimeTopicPresentersNotes
5 min
Walter Kozlowski

Gergely Csatari requests additional agenda item to discuss transition from md to rst.

We have quorum.

Minutes approved.



5 min

Announcements and upcoming events

5 min
  •  Inputs into October GB (Governance Board) meeting
    •  - Need to provide information about Anuket and other projects under the Anuket Umbrella. Due by   

Please get your inputs to the October GB meeting!!!  Use the slides that were sent out as a template.   Issues :  RC2 PTL is missing.  Overall contribution level in RC2 is down.  Hear from board that Anuket is important, but the contributing companies need to allocate resources to back up that commitment with specific skills such as resources that can do coding work, full stack developers, and some architects.  RC1 needs more more architects and people who can document the project.  Stress the importance of the project.  Anuket Assured needs support from the board member companies. 

  • Anuket Assured
  • RC1-2 understaffed
  • Overall need for more support for coding activities – need to quantify what those activities to validate their value – or not

The community has to validate the value of the Anuket project.  Hoping that the EUAG can fill the role of supporting and validating the requirements going forward.

Per Emma Foley There is a very clear link between RCs and Anuket Assured. Documentation needs to be in place so it's easy to see which test cases in RCs tells you that the box is ticked for each requirement in RAs.

  •  Next Workshop will be the week of January 17th.  Will start planning in the next few weeks.  Undecided if it will be virtual or in person.

ONES Summit is going on now.  Mixed reactions to the experience.

Lunch break makes no sense in a hybrid environment and drains the energy of virtual participants (having a lunch break from 22:30 to 24:00 in my case).  It was set up like it was in person in PST which was just weird for the folks in the rest of the world.

It would be good to see stats about the in-person vs virtual participation.

We are looking for ways to provide feedback to LF about the experience.

OpenStack PTG ECG schedule (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ecg-ptg-october-2021):

  • Automation and tooling -- Day 1 - Oct 18 - 1400 UTC - 1500 UTC
    • Portable automation (see line 84)-- Rob lead
    • Maybe bring in the hardware topic as well?
    • possible adjacent communities: K3S/Fleet
  • Security -- Day 1-  Oct 18 - 1500 UTC - 1600 UTC
    • Trust and Verification for the Edge (see line 75) -- Beth if no one takes it
    • possible adjacent communities: OpenNESS - David to reach out
  • Networking -- Day 2 -  Oct 19 - 1400 UTC - 1600 UTC
    • Do you know what your network is doing at the Edge?? (see line 60) -- Beth lead
    • DDI (DHCP, DNS, IPAM) automation and integration (see line 65) -- David lead
    • possible adjacent communities: MEF / ETSI -- Beth lead
  • APIs and architecture --  Day 3 -  October 20: 1300 UTC - 1600 UTC
    • Containers suck at the Edge (see line 71)-- Gergely lead +1
    • OpenYurt presentation by rambo...@gmail.com (https://groups.google.com/g/openyurt/c/JwNR0wS4tcA/m/NfCD60RjDAAJ)
    • Do we need  Edge specific APIs or...?  (see line 49)-- Beth lead
    • Centralized/decentralized/federated
    • /multiple control planes? (see line 54) -- Ildiko lead (may help if I'm available: adrien, answer no later than next week - sounds good, thanks!)
    • possible adjacent communities: Eclipse (IoFog/Fog05) / MEF / ETSI / 
5 min
Need 40 votes - only 23, why
    • ?
10 min

Sandra Jackson thanks members for adding nominees

People are encouraged to nominate themselves.

The latest version of the charter has removed the requirement for one vote per company.  The wiki has been updated to reflect the correct version of the charter.  Discussion of the TSC composition.  Do we need to limit the membership to a single representative for any given company?

Beth Cohen suggest that we can raise the limit on representatives per company (2 max), but there should be an upper limit

TSC members agreed that Scot Steeleis fully eligible to vote in the election due to his contributions to the project (no objections).

Does the TSC agree to amend the charter, replacing the old language with this NEW Language:

Maximum of two members per company/organisation
o
If more than two (2) TSC members would be from the same group of Related
Companies, either at the time of election or from a later job change or changes
to company owner
ship, they will jointly decide on the two (2) individuals to be
the TSC members.

13 TSC members agree to the change to the charter per the language above.

Vote to remove the 2/3 quorum requirement for elections.

13 TSC member agree to the change to the charter to remove the 2/3 quorum requirement (for voter turnout/ballots returned – see Election Validity Requirement Vote text in the Agenda portion of this page).

Supportive comments to retroactively apply the removal of the quorum requirement for replacing Mark Beierlwith Ulrich Kleber.  TSC members agreed to apply the Election Validity Requirement charter change with zero objections.

Ulrich Kleberis now a member of the TSC.  Congrats are in order

.


15 min
Release Updates 
  •  Kali Marketing with the Anuket-Assured Program Lakelse progress
    •  M3 scheduled for Oct 19
    •  Release process meeting resumed Friday, Oct 1
      • Reviewed Jira issues.  
        • Sent mail to PTLs requesting updates to issues assigned to Lakelse.
      • Next meeting this Friday, Oct 8
          • Sent email to RI2 team requesting confirmation on development status
          • Sent email to spec team requesting completion of M3 items
          • Scot Steele to schedule meeting to review prelim documentation status
      •  Proposal to extend M3 for 2 weeks for Specification work streams (until Nov 2) (passed 10/15)
    •  Next Release Process meeting Friday, Oct 15
    •  Release naming update (Sandra Jackson) Release Name Selection

The editing period is not really needed to be so long anymore as the writers of the docs are editing as they go, so there is less need for clean up than there used to be.  Vote to extend M3 for specifications passed. 

David McBridereached out to the RI2 team and they requested more time, so this change to the schedule is helping them.  Scot Steeleis looking for a time to assess the status of the preliminary documentation for the non-requirements/specification projects.

Will have another release process meeting on Friday.  Please attend if you have any questions or comments.

10 5 min 
Discuss again tomorrow

Pankaj Goyalnotes that the doc doesn't distinguish between code projects and specification type projects.  The doc will be rewritten to cover both types of projects. 

10 min
  •  CCC updates

Scot Steelehas been working on the release process to streamline and better document the process.  Have been working on updating Chapter 0 to make it Anuket friendly.  CCC is still responsible for Workshop logistics.  Will be supporting the upcoming Workshop week of January 17th.  Will be requesting session topics over the next few weeks.

Need access to OpenVdocs for Scot Steeleand Beth Cohen

10 min

Walter Kozlowski and sub-project Leaders

Internship Update: 2 Completed Successfully, 1 ongoing, 1 failed to complete (2nd Installment not paid).

5 min
  •  GitLab update 
    •  EasyCLA support
No Updates.
  • We are still looking for feedback from the EasyCLA implementation team. We offered our help to alfa test the implementation, but no answer received. Trevor Bramwell , Sandra Jackson  can you please check this?
5 min
  •  

    Status Updates

    •  LF IT/Infra update: (Trevor Bramwell)


No updates


5 min

Beth Cohen MEF - Edge proposal looking for supporting and contributing Co's - contact Beth  - Standard API's for edge - need 3 more Co's who are MEF members.Edge API project is awaiting one more sponsor to become a full project.

Walter Kozlowskiand Pankaj Goyalare chair and deputy chair of the GSMA OITF


0 min

AOB

Gergely Csatari : conversion from md to rst


0 minAOB