Anuket Project

Attendees 

  1. Walter Kozlowski (Telstra)
  2. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
  3. Gergely Csatari (Nokia) - co-chair
  4. guanyu zhu (Huawei)

Absent (TSC)

  1. Dan Xu (Huawei)
  2. Riccardo Gasparetto Stori (Vodafone)
  3. Beth Cohen (Verizon)
  4. Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)

Other Attendees 


Agenda


Time

Topic

Presenters

Notes (if you have comments prior to the meeting add them to this column with your name as the source of the comment)
5 min
2 min

Announcements


  • F2F Budapest DnTF
    • Register and propose a talk
    • There will be no official support for remote participation
  • Open Infrastructure PTG
    • Getting closer and closer.
    • Register to receive communication
  • ONE Summit Regional Day: India  
  • ONE Summit - San Jose - 2024.04
    • CFP is open
    • CFP deadline is December 3 at 11:59 PM PST (UTC-8)
      • A: Gergely Csatari  to ask in a mail from the TSC if we want to talk about anything in the ONE Summit as Anuket TSC?
10 min
  • Walter as the board representative
    1. My plan is to create a cross LFN wiki site to collect information, suggestions, feedback from the projects, as well as to convey the Board related and appropriate information to the project committers.
    2. My suggestion would be to have a regular (say once in a quarter or at least 6 months) an open Board meeting (like we did for AI).
    3. I think, we will need to raise a proposal for the Board to assist in seeking more resources and other (what?) support for the LFN activities.
    4. In my view, Board could influence LFN bodies to help in better marketing the projects and the committers’ efforts.  Any good ideas how?
    5. Perhaps IT support issues if we think that they should be improved.
  • Next board meeting is end of this month
  • LFN AI Task force has biweekly meetings on Wednesdays
    • No public wiki available
  • Cross LFN wiki not yet created
5 min

Sandra Jackson 

  • Fabio Palumbo is on vacation and Sandra Jackson did not get an update from him
  • Based on discussions with Cedric Ollivier it seems that there are two build servers, one managed by LF IT and one by Orange.
  • There will a weekly Technical Meeting about the topic on  
5 min
  • GitHub org admin rights
    • Who should have admin rights to the GitHub org? Some selected community members, and if yes who these should be? LFN staff?
  • At the moment Gergely Csatari has admin rights to the GitHub org
  • Only a very limited set of people have admin right to the GitHub org, but at least two persons should have it
  • Let's not change our current settings
1 min


  • Fabio Palumbo is on holiday we do not know when he is back
  • If he is not back by tomorrow Sandra Jackson will follow up with someone else from the IT team
5 min
  • Separate repo and readthedocs or one repo and readthedocs
    • Separate repos – multiple readthedocs
      • Benefits
        • Possibility to have separate builds. A bit more isolation of errors (e.g: a broken link in RA2 will not break the build of RM)
        • Cedric already did the repo separation
      • Drawbacks
        • Lots of GitHub repos to manage
        • Lots of Readthedocs projects to manage
        • GitHub actions need to be rewritten and reconfigured in all the repos
        • Difficult to implement any theme changes
    • One repo – one readthedocs
      • Benefits
        • One GitHub repo and one Readthedocs to manage
        • Same look and feel of all the specs
      • Drawbacks
        • Needs a little bit of editing in the main index.rst
  • There will be a discussion about this in the Weekly Technical Meeting.
  • There is a WIP branch here: https://github.com/nokia/anuket-specifications/tree/one-build
  • Separating the repos would increase the independence of projects and would separate errors in the different repos on the other hand it would make the documents more inconsistent


5 min
    • Value of Anuket / Anuket Task force (https://wiki.anuket.io/x/CgBWAw)
      • A very subjective project health assessment
        • Kubref - Ask Dan Xu about status.  Generally has not been actively been worked on for months
        • Barometer - There is no PTL
        • Vineperf - Probably there is no PTL
        • Thoth – PTL (Rohit Singh Rathaur )
          • A: Beth Cohen will work with the AI taskforce to move Thoth to the AI project.
        • RM - active, but heavily relies on Walter Kozlowski as a PTL, who is doing the work to move to GSMA docs repository and updates to add new technology
        • RA1 - mature, only doc theme related changed in Orinoco
        • RI1 - mature, only doc theme related changed in Orinoco
        • RC1 - practically merged to RA1, no changes in Orinoco
        • RA2 - Active, but limited on resources (3 active contributors)
        • RI2 - Active, but limited on resources
        • RC2 - Cedric Ollivier is now PTL and re-activated.  1 active contributor
        • Functest, functest-kubernetes - active, relies on Cedric Ollivier alone
      • Discuss in TSC
        • Should we archive the inactive projects? We need to synch with the project contributors on this.
        • Discuss Vineperf and Thoth status
        • Focus resources on RM, R*2 and functest*
  • No conclusion on Barometer yet


5 min
  • Release Updates



  • Orinoco
    • Beth Cohen sent the blog post and is being edited by Pano Xinos 
    • Draft blog post:
      • Please review and provide comments by  
    • The plan is to vote on Orinoco release readiness on  
  • Pieman
    • Pieman Schedule
    • Schedule was updated assuming that the release can start  
    • Move the dates with one week and vote on the schedule on  
  • New release names
    • Ballots are not out yet

  • Nominations are open, no nominations yet
  • Nomination will close on  
2 min
  • SPC and TAC update
Gergely Csatari , Beth Cohen 
  • No update
2 min

Sub-project Leaders

  • No update
5 min

  • No update
1 minAOBBeth Cohen 
  • None