Anuket Project

Attendees 

Absent (TSC)

  1. Dan Xu (Huawei)
  2. Riccardo Gasparetto Stori (Vodafone)

Other Attendees 


Agenda


Time

Topic

Presenters

Notes (if you have comments prior to the meeting add them to this column with your name as the source of the comment)
5 min
2 min
  1. Announcements


  • LFN DnTF Budapest
    • No updates
    • Planning is ongoing
    • Register
    • Add you topics to the topics page
    • Remote participation is best effort in best case
  • Open Infra PTG
    • Register! You will get nice event communication
  • ONE Summit
    • No update
10 min
  • Walter as the board representative
    1. My plan is to create a cross LFN wiki site to collect information, suggestions, feedback from the projects, as well as to convey the Board related and appropriate information to the project committers.
    2. My suggestion would be to have a regular (say once in a quarter or at least 6 months) an open Board meeting (like we did for AI).
    3. I think, we will need to raise a proposal for the Board to assist in seeking more resources and other (what?) support for the LFN activities.
    4. In my view, Board could influence LFN bodies to help in better marketing the projects and the committers’ efforts.  Any good ideas how?
    5. Perhaps IT support issues if we think that they should be improved.
  • No update
5 min

Sandra Jackson 

1 min
        • A: Fabio Palumbo to summarize in a mail to the Tech Discuss mailing list the purpose of this repo.


No update.  Sandra Jackson to check with Fabio Palumbo 

5 min
  • Separate repo and readthedocs or one repo and readthedocs
    • Separate repos – multiple readthedocs
      • Benefits
        • Possibility to have separate builds. A bit more isolation of errors (e.g: a broken link in RA2 will not break the build of RM)
        • Cedric already did the repo separation
      • Drawbacks
        • Lots of GitHub repos to manage
        • Lots of Readthedocs projects to manage
        • GitHub actions need to be rewritten and reconfigured in all the repos
        • Difficult to implement any theme changes
    • One repo – one readthedocs
      • Benefits
        • One GitHub repo and one Readthedocs to manage
        • Same look and feel of all the specs
      • Drawbacks
        • Needs a little bit of editing in the main index.rst
    • A: Gergely to summarize the situation to the mailing list
  • We will discuss the options in the Weekly Technical Meeting
5 min
    • Value of Anuket / Anuket Task force (https://wiki.anuket.io/x/CgBWAw)
      • A very subjective project health assessment
        • Kubref - Ask Dan Xu about status.  Generally has not been actively been worked on for months
        • Barometer - There is no PTL
        • Vineperf - Probably there is no PTL
        • Thoth – PTL (Rohit Singh Rathaur )
        • RM - active, but heavily relies on Walter Kozlowski as a PTL, who is doing the work to move to GSMA docs repository and updates to add new technology
        • RA1 - mature, only doc theme related changed in Orinoco
        • RI1 - mature, only doc theme related changed in Orinoco
        • RC1 - practically merged to RA1, no changes in Orinoco
        • RA2 - Active, but limited on resources (3 active contributors)
        • RI2 - Active, but limited on resources
        • RC2 - Cedric Ollivier is now PTL and re-activated.  1 active contributor
        • Functest, functest-kubernetes - active, relies on Cedric Ollivier alone
      • Discuss in TSC
        • Should we archive the inactive projects? We need to synch with the project contributors on this.
        • Discuss Vineperf and Thoth status
        • Focus resources on RM, R*2 and functest*

Confirm that Barometer has no PTL.  Rohit Singh Rathaur might be taking over.  Would work with Emma Foley to do it.  Under discussion.  Dan Xu is wanting to combine the Kubref work with Sylva.  Discussions have started to see if this is possible.

A: Beth Cohen will work with the AI taskforce to move Thoth to the AI project.

5 min
  • Release Updates



  • Orinoco
    • Blogpost
      • Will be finished this week
  • Need to check on the changes to Kuberef and Barometer and merge them into the new branch in https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/c/releng/+/74143
  • Cedric Ollivier needs to merge his work into the main branch.
  • No updates for Pieman planning.  Will hopefully start after next week.
  • Release names are still being vetted.  Pano Xinos needs to review.
    • Names reviewed.  Dropping Quantico – associated with the CIA HQ.
    • Ballots will be sent out shortly.

The Sept 26 date is when the active contributors list was pulled, so that is OK.  Nominations would start 10 October 2023, and close on 24 October 2023.  Will change the schedule so that the start date is clear  Format:  Date + # of weeks.  Example:  10 September 2023 + 2 weeks
Vote on elections schedule: Unanimous vote for.  5+ 1, 0 -1, 0 nothing. 
2 min
  • SPC and TAC update
Gergely Csatari , Beth Cohen 

No Update on the SPC or the TAC

2 min

Sub-project Leaders

No updates.
5 min

Read the docs will be discussed in the Technical Meeting this week.
1 minAOBBeth Cohen 
Nope