Anuket Project

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 50 Next »

2021-05-25 TSC Agenda and Minutes

Attendees 

  1. Al Morton (AT&T)
  2. Walter Kozlowski (Telstra)
  3. Cedric Ollivier (Orange)
  4. Beth Cohen (Verizon)
  5. Frank Brockners (Cisco)
  6. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
  7. Trevor Cooper (Intel)
  8. Sawyer Bergeron(proxy for Lincoln)
  9. Emma Foley (Red Hat)
  10. Gergely Csatari (Nokia)
  11. Jie Niu (China Mobile)
  12. Sridhar Rao  (Spirent)

Absent (TSC)

  1. Mark Beierl (Canonical)
  2. Riccardo Gasparetto Stori (Vodafone)
  3. Ahmed El Sawaf (STC)


Other Attendees 

  1. Scot Steele (AT&T)
  2. Pankaj Goyal (AT&T)
  3. Ildiko Vancsa
  4. Jim Baker
  5. Pierre Lynch
  6. David McBride
  7. Trevor Bramwell

Agenda

TimeTopicPresentersNotes
5 min

Meeting Administration

Al Morton
1 min

Announcements

EUAG/Anuket TSC joint meeting will be held during the Workshop.  Amount of overlap TBD.  Everyone is encouraged to sign up for the workshop so we can plan for the attendance.
10 minScot Steele

Community Coordination Workstream Proposal.pdf Review of Scot Steele's proposal to support the TSC by shifting the non-technical work to this committee. 
Initial members suggested would be Scot and Beth - but open to additional participants from the community (i.e. the CCC is open to all community members). 
Cedric mentioned that there are potential areas of overlap between the CCC and the LF project management (as done by Jim). 
David mentioned that the committee should be a "sub committee".

The TSC AGREES to form this new "CCC" subcommittee.

10 min
  • Kali Release Status and Lakelse process update
David reviewed Lakelse schedule https://wiki.anuket.io/download/attachments/7637033/Anuket%20Lakelse.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1621630712734&api=v2 - there were considerations for tweaks, but ultimately the schedule was left unchanged.
5 min

Still waiting for final legal approval for Charter for sign off.  Completed the discussion on the project operations doc.  Ready for TSC approval, but waiting for the Charter legal sign off before TSC vote.

Al Mortonand Jim Bakerbrought up the issue of how to capture metrics for the use of the Anuket project artifacts.  This includes how to identify metrics for the reference docs and the testing modules (functest).  This is useful for validating the usefulness of the project to the wider community.

Anuket should specify what information we require from LF Insights. E.g. today, there is reporting for

  • number of docker image pulls (from dockerhub)

Need some metrics on Anuket project artifacts

  • Downloads of Functest modules
  • readthedocs (number of hits on the site)
  • Number of downloads of RI images

LF Insights team is able to add new metrics quite quickly (~ 6 weeks). 

Cedric Ollivier mentions that we can easily count how many times our containers have been downloaded (Functest has be downloaded more than 100K ; Xtesting 50K). I think a survey could bring an higher value by highlighting who uses which software and for what (as ONAP - already discussed in TSC). Orange also shared a reuse in RFP:

10 min

WS Leads and PTLs



Sridhar Rao

5 min
  • Feedback from GB meeting on  
    • Anuket-Assured topic

5 min
  • Anuket marketing and Recruiting

1 min
  • Status Updates

    • Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade status
    • LF IT/Infra update: (Aric GardnerTrevor Bramwell)

Trevor Bramwell

@ Aric Gardner


1 min


0 min
  • AOB


Action Items

  • Al Morton  Jim Baker Agreement on Industry Impact Metrics from our repos (about 4-5 objective measures)  for technology  - need a support ticket write-up.
  • No labels