Versions Compared

Old Version 21

changes.mady.by.user Suresh Krishnan

Saved on

compared with

New Version 22

changes.mady.by.user Walter Kozlowski

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Zoom link:

https://zoom.us/j/997256543?pwd=MWptM0F0Y1NpckhFVUgrZnM2TkJ0Zz09

Attendees

Please add your name in here:

Agenda:

    • Agenda 
      • Agenda bashing
        • From TSC: Technical officers
        • Update to Chapter 10 Gaps
        • Per: In 3 weeks another presentation on K8s Networking (March 24)
      • Updates from Work Groups
        • WG1 xgVela collaboration: Pankaj: Qihui Zhao is XGVELA TSC lead in contact with Pankaj (RM: Walter, Petar, Bob, Gergely, Pankaj), our focused on general PaaS 
        • WG2 Acceleration: Petar: come back in March
        • WG3 Storage: Beth: will start in March
        • WG4 K8s multi-networking and load balancing: Per: presentation to RM on "Network semantics" on Feb 24 (25 minutes)
        • WG5 oRAN collaboration: Tomas: Sukhdev, Pankaj, Karine, Toshi, Tom, Arkady and optional Walter proposed  meeting 2000 UTC  to be organised by Tomas next week (Mon or Tue)
      • Review RM Issues for closure or next release (date of the next release to be defined)


    • Issue NoStatusDescriptionAssigneeDiscussion
      1720Backlog

      [RM Ch05] backwards& Forward compatibility #1720

      Walter Kozlowski

      Walter Kozlowski : after careful consideration I think the current text and its placement in 4.2 is correct as it relates to the cloud infrastructure profiles and flavours, that are defined in 4.2 before the text on backwards compatibility.  We will need rename CNTT to Anuket as in other places. This contents will need to review and possibly update once the Anuket release process is finalised. Proposal: CLOSE

      1876New

      [RM] Add new requirement to address networking scale

      Sukhdev Kapur

      Walter Kozlowski: should it be a part of work of WG4 on multi-networking?  What requirements are specifically requested and where they should be placed? Sukhdev Kapur, please clarify.  Proposal: DISCUSS at RM, made it more specific and assign to WG4 work, with an assignee who will raise and work on the relevant PR.

      2056Backlog

      [RM Ch03, Ch04 & Ch05] Storage: enhance content #2056

      Petar Torre Karine Sevilla

      Walter Kozlowski: Proposal: reassign to WG3 and to Beth Cohen. RM needs a plan what WG3 can deliver for the Anuket "K release (June 2021); after that we can replace this Issue by more specific issues and close 2056

      2067Backlog

      [RM Ch2.2] Review use-cases that are used for the analysis

      Tom Kivlin

      Walter Kozlowski: this is a very generic issue raised by Tom Kivlin, who moved on form his RA-2 role.  Proposal: take is a topic for the next RM meeting agenda, CLOSE 2067, and if needed raise specific Issues to add new or update existing Use Cases.

      2068New

      [RM Ch2] Review analysis and whether the documented cloud infrastructure profiles need modifying/adding to

      		None

      Walter Kozlowski: similar in a sense to 2067, raised by Tom Kivlin, who moved on form his RA-2 role.  Proposal: discuss with RA-1 Pankaj Goyal and RA-2 Riccardo Gasparetto Stori to request what they need from RM in this area.  If any action needed, replace 2068 by specific Issues/PRs, otherwise CLOSE.

      2087New

      [RM Chxx] Automation (closed loop automation)

      Tomas Fredberg Walter Kozlowski

      Walter Kozlowski: the issue raised by Walter Kozlowski to discuss at RM.  Proposal: put this as an agenda item for RM meeting, identify what is needed and what cna be done for "K" release, and then replace 2087 by specific Issues, and then CLOSE generic 2087

      2135New

      [RM Ch03] Illogical sub chapter order

      Tomas Fredberg Walter Kozlowski

      Walter Kozlowski: there seems to be an agreement how to reorder, any additional comments please do in https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/2135. Proposal: Walter Kozlowski and Tomas Fredberg split up work between them, raise PRs and start working on them

      2265New

      [RM] Need a profile or flavor for memory intensive applications

      		None

      Walter Kozlowski: there seem to be an agreement between Pankaj Goyal, Beth Cohen Karine Sevilla Joao Rodrigues

      on what needs to be done but it is unclear what needs to be done in RM vs RA-1 and RA-2. Proposal: identify actions in RM meeting and re-edit this Issue for RM (alternatively close if no action on RM) and/or add issues on RA- 1 and RA-2.

      2276New

      [RM Ch03] Update Service Function Chaining 3.5.1

      		@kumarsumangit

      Walter Kozlowski : this is really new issue (raised 3 days ago and it is currently under review. Proposal: discuss after the review is done.











      Any new issues to be raised in relation to the work currently planned or in progress in work groups, or otherwise? Please add to the table above.

    • Actions:

      • Pankaj: XGVela
        • request from XGVela to present Anuket
        • form a working collaboration group between Anuket and XGVela: Pankaj, Bob, Petar, Gergely, Walter (optional)
        • Pankaj to organise the initial first meeting
      • Petar: Acceleration: Petar to organise initial working meeting: Petar, Per, Suresh, Tomas, Arkady, Gergely, Ildiko, Walter (optional) + volunteers (in March) (co-ordination with oRAN)
      • Per: Load balancing: Per to present to RM on how to extend K8s networking (in 2 week time) followed by actions
      • All: Memory optimisation: created an issue on memory intensive profile or flavour for comments from the Team

    • Minutes: