- Created by David McBride, last modified by Emma Foley on Aug 13, 2021
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current View Page History
« Previous Version 41 Next »
You may subscribe to the meeting and get meeting logistics here.
August 13, 2021
Attendees: Pankaj Goyal, Scot Steele, Emma Foley, Sandra Jackson Cedric Ollivier Al Morton Rihab Banday
Agenda:
Notes:
- There are two bridges listed for the meeting, this causes confusion on joining - needs to be fixed
- Focus on answering the question: Is this testable, as opposed to scoping a particular release
August 6, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Pankaj Goyal, Scot Steele, Sridhar Rao, Georg Kunz, Rihab Banday, Emma Foley, Sandra Jackson
Agenda:
- RA Review
- Discuss review process
- Prioritize reviews
- Review GitHub issue submission guidelines
Notes:
- Group consensus that we focus on RA2, with RA1 left for offline review.
- Pankaj suggests skipping 2.2 and beginning with section 2.3.
- Emma suggests that we have a mapping between tests and requirements (i.e., which tests apply to a specific requirement)
- Does this already exist?
- We will initially review only "must", then later review "should" requirements if there is time.
- Reviewed table 2.3 through requirement req.inf.ntw.10.
- Scot and Emma to host next week's meeting (Aug 13)
July 30, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Pankaj Goyal, Scot Steele, Al Morton
Agenda:
- Review M2 Tasks
Notes:
- Need to organize review of RA1 and RA2
- Assign review to software project PTLs
- Break out requirements into tables
- Conduct standup review with PTLs in release meeting to check progress
- Al suggests that we discuss in TSC meeting
- New sections created: https://wiki.anuket.io/x/3410
July 23, 2021 (Canceled)
July 16, 2021 (Canceled)
July 9, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Pankaj Goyal, Scot Steele, Cedric Ollivier, Jim Baker
Agenda:
- Review M1 Status
- Meeting canceled next two weeks (July 16, July 23)
Notes:
- RI lags dependency on RA (i.e., RI depends on previous release of RA)
- RC is dependent on current development of RA
- Cedric willing to be workstream lead for RC1/RC2 based on no changes to CI through the Lakelse release.
- TSC needs to make a decision about RI criteria for release in terms of how much of RC the RI can pass
- Discuss with TSC
- One proposal: set a minimum threshold percentage, then publish results with RI release
- Need to be clear about threshold measurement
- Cedric emphasizes that status/stability of RELENG will affect the success of the Lakelse release
- Next meeting July 30
July 2, 2021 (Canceled)
June 25, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Pankaj Goyal, Al Morton, Scot Steele
Agenda:
- Review M1 Status
- Meeting canceled next week (July 2)
Notes:
- Discussed status of M1
- Still missing most project release plans
- RC/RI planning page is mostly incomplete
- Schedule for M1 appears to be at risk
- Noted that there is some disagreement/confusion about traceability between specifications and software artifacts (e.g., RC/RI ==> RA)
June 18, 2021 (Canceled)
June 11, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Jim Baker , Pankaj Goyal
Agenda:
- Review M1 Status
- Update GitHub with release name string and milestone dates
- Self release process
- Meeting canceled next week (June 18)
Notes:
- Reviewed status of CNTT/ GitHub
- Milestones already entered
- Pankaj added label for "Lakelse"
June 4, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Scot Steele , Jim Baker
Agenda:
- Discuss email to team describing M1 tasks. Who are the workstream leads?
- Review presentation material for release process session at Dev & Test Forum next week
- Update GitHub with release name string and milestone dates
Notes:
- M1 task email
- Addressed by Pankaj response to my email
- Dev & Test Forum presentation review
- Added slide regarding post sign off
- GitHub updates
- Pankaj unavailable, so deferring to next week
May 21, 2021 (CANCELED)
Canceled
May 21, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Scot Steele , Pankaj Goyal , Jim Baker , Al Morton
Agenda:
- Determine processes for milestone processes for M4 and M5
- Discuss self release process
- Schedule proposal for Lakelse
Notes:
- Text
May 14, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Scot Steele , Pankaj Goyal , Jim Baker , Al Morton
Agenda:
- Determine processes for milestone processes for M4 and M5
- Discuss self release process
- Schedule proposal for Lakelse
Notes:
- Text
May 7, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Scot Steele, Pankaj Goyal Al Morton
Agenda:
- Determine processes for milestone processes for M3 and M4
- Discuss Independent release process
- Schedule proposal for Lakelse
Notes:
- Release process principles
- A project or workstream may slip an internal release milestone with TSC approval
- A project or workstream may be included in the major release after the scheduled release, with TSC approval
- The project must declare for the Supplemental Release (M7, typically 2 to 4 weeks late) prior to the M3 date.
Apr 30, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Pankaj Goyal, Emma Foley, Jim Baker, Scot Steele
Agenda:
- Determine processes for milestone criteria for M2 and M3
- Discuss Independent release process
Notes:
- Al Morton Test projects are fulfilling a list of test cases from the requirements listed in the Reference Conformance documentation
- Tests that are in the Reference Conformance verify the Reference Architecture/Reference Model
- End user buy-in – validation of the RC/Anuket Assured badges have value in the acquisition process
- Traceability: Every test in RC needs to be linked to a specification in RM/RA AND every spec item needs a test
Apr 23, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Jim Baker, Pankaj Goyal
Agenda:
- Review Release Process Milestone Planning and resolve issues
- Determine processes for milestone criteria
Notes:
- Small turnout this week due to OpenStack event.
- Completed documentation of processes for M1 and started on M2.
- Pankaj Goyal shared template from Elbrus release used by work streams to document high level scope
- Gergely Csatari shared process for resolving feedback to specifications using GitHub Issues
Apr 16, 2021 (CANCELED)
Apr 9, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Ildiko Vancsa , Pankaj Goyal Gergely Csatari, Al Morton, James Gu
Agenda
- Review Release Process Milestone Planning and resolve issues
- Determine processes for milestone criteria
Notes
- Text
Apr 2, 2021 (CANCELED)
Agenda
- Review Release Process Milestone Planning and resolve issues
Notes
- Text
Mar 26, 2021
Attendees: David McBride, Al Morton, Karine Sevilla, Olivier Smith, Karine Sevilla
Agenda
- Review Release Process Milestone Planning and resolve issues
Notes
- Reviewed comments in red from Pankaj Goyal
- Clarified that the milestone table only indicates criteria for meeting the milestone (i.e., tasks finished), not how the activities are accomplished, or when they start. Those will be determined separately.
- Karine Sevilla suggested adding a task to finalize spec version numbering for M5.
- Al Morton suggested changing the M1 milestone name from "Release Planning" to "Release Definition".
- After above changes, milestone plan is at V .19.
- No labels