Versions Compared


  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


  1. Scot Steele (Co-Chair)
  2. Beth Cohen (Verizon)
  3. Pankaj Goyal (Microsoft)
  4. Dan Xu 
  5. Walter Kozlowski(Telstra)
  6. Gergely Csatari (Nokia, Co-Chair)
  7. Riccardo Gasparetto Stori 
  8. Lincoln Lavoie 

Absent (TSC)

  1. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)Walter Kozlowski(Telstra)
  2. Lei Huang Lincoln Lavoie 

Other Attendees 

  1.  Al Morton (AT&T)
  2.  Ildiko Vancsa (OIF)





Notes (if you have comments prior to the meeting add them to this column with your name as the source of the comment)

5 min
2 min


5 min
  •  Anuket Assured and CNCF CNF Certification collaboration
Gergely Csatari 
  • Beth brought this up in SPC, but the actual discussion did not happen
  • We will cover this in the SPC from now on
5 min
  •  Volunteer for RC2 PTL
    • A: Scot Steele will send out a mail to vote on that the Anuket TSC does not see headless projects as a good practice
  •  Volunteer for Release Manager
  •  Volunteer for Thoth PTL (Thoth PTL Election)
  •  Interim TSC election for the seat of Lei Huang
  • No volunteer for RC2 and Release Manager
    • Scot Steele  will do a bit more marketing to get someone interested
5 min
Fabio Palumbo 

5 min
Release Updates
  •  Orinoco - Orinoco Home
    •  M2  
      • VOTE: Scot Steele will send out a vote mail about M2 today (   ) US time
    •  M3  

2 min
Beth Cohen 
2 min
Sandra Jackson 

2 min
  •  SPC and TAC update
Gergely Csatari , Beth Cohen 
  • LFN is perceived as having a high barrier to projects joining
  • Network projects coming into the LF are created outside of LFN - Nephio good example
  • Should network related projects coming into the LF default to LFN?
  • Discussion of project onboarding into the LFN continued.
    • Are there blockers?
    • Is it Teleco specific?
    • Is it Funding?
    • Should there be overlap between projects?
      • Catherine Lefevre The selection of new projects is important. There should be scrutiny
  • Jonne Soininen If retaining control of the budget is the gating factor, is it better to go back to having an independent budget for each project? 
    • There seems to be some general agreement that budgeting should not be the considering factor for new project induction into LF or LFN but rather the technology alignment.
    • Kenny Paul noted that the original purpose of forming the LFN is because companies did not want to "nickel-and-dimed" for each project, but rather central funding for the Networking projects.
2 min

Sub-project Leaders

5 min

1 minAOB
  • Upload your D&TF presentations
  • Thanks for your work Lei Huang. Do not be a stranger!