...
- This is mostly a management issue
- Most easy for PDF 2.0 contributors would be to work in CIRV as it is an active project
- Problem is that CIRV is not an installation project
- Infra WG-s opinion should be also checkedÂ
- What is the status of WG-s in Anuket?
- So far we carried them over from OPNFV
Jack Morgan was leading it, but he is not available now
- What is the status of WG-s in Anuket?
- At the moment the PDF 2.0 work does not have an upstream repo to collaborate
- An option is to create a subrepo under criv, like https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/admin/repos/cirv-pdf20
- Usage of CRIV is also good for the visibility of the PDF 2.0 activity
- Will we keep using https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT for the specifications?
- So far yes
- Diversity of PDF-s
- Different installer teams have different PDF variants
- We should have a common data model, but at the moment everyone have different ideas about what shold that be
- Next steps:
- PDF 2.0 work will be done in a subrepo under CIRV
- CIRV needs to be re-chartered
- Could even lead to a name change of the project
- Circulate the PDF 2.0 template in the mailing list to get feedback from the installer projects
- Implement RI1 related changes to the PDF 2.0 template
Discussion of comments to Anuket Charter and TSC Procedures revisions - Gergely Csatari
...