Anuket Project

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Purpose of this page is to document OPNFV community interaction with the LFN Strategic Planning Committee (SPC). The charter of the SPC as well as other details about membership and working materials can be found here: LFN SPC Wiki

SPC Questionnaire to LFN Projects.

Clarification on the meaning of "project" in this questionnaire: Per its charter the SPC has an advisory role towards the Governing Board (GB). It prepares LFN strategy proposals to guide the LFN portfolio including its budget priorities for GB discussion and approval. It also provide guidance to the LFN projects according to the strategy set by the GB. For purposes of this questionnaire, "project" refers to an LFN portfolio project ... i.e. OPNFV. The TSC should assimilate and roll up feedback from OPNFV (sub)projects and individuals and provide this consolidated view to the SPC.

Process for collecting input: This questionnaire was discussed in the TSC meeting and sent out to the OPNFV  community on 16 July 2019. Link to email thread can be found here: <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>. 

  • Currently no deadline has been set by the SPC for providing feedback however a timely response will be appreciated to help prepare for SPC / OPNFV discussions (not yet scheduled)
  • Choices for providing input:
    • Respond to the tech-discuss mailing list 
    • Attend the weekly technical forum - this will be an agenda topic over the next few weeks
    • Provide feedback directly (email or schedule a call) with OPNFV SPC rep. Trevor Cooper
    • Provide feedback directly with a TSC rep. who has agreed to represent your input to the TSC
    • Attend future TSC meeting where this will be discussed (not currently scheduled)


Questions: 

Bullet points on SPC mission and objective to understand the questions, clarify to the community

Q1 confusing

Multiple choice to give guaidance / direction on what answers are expected or give examples ? SPC does not want to be prescriptive. Need a starting point with some suggestions. LAst choice always open.


1. How would you like the SPC to interact with your project?

  • How would you like to communicate with the SPC (give some choices ... method and frequency)


  • Through rep (Trevor Cooper) give weekly update in TSC
  • If rep thinks its important should invite e.g. SPC chair or other appropriate person to attend a TSC meeting


2. What are the three top areas where you feel your project should focus and invest? (Examples:  Growing the community, infrastructure improvements, gaining adoption)

  1. CNTT (reference implementations and compliance frameworks, etc.)
  2. Adoption of OPNFV deliverable (infrastructure, testing, etc.) ... commercial and other communities
  3. Growing the community (investment by member companies)

3. What community asks have not been completed in a reasonable and timely manner?

  • PM (now solved)
  • Asked for organizing a developer event an Kubecon

4. Strategic relationships and interaction with other Projects (inside and outside LFN)

  • Which projects are up and/or downstream for your project?
    • OpenStack
    • ODL
    • TF
    • Kubernetes
    • etc.
    • ?
  • What collaboration / interaction with other projects is working well?
    • OpenStack
    • ODL
    • ?
  • What collaboration / interaction (existing or desired) with other projects is not working well or is a gap?
    • Akraino
    • ?
  • What collaboration / interaction would your project benefit from that is not already happening?
    • CNTT (WIP)
    • ?
  • How do you suggest improving collaboration / interaction with other projects?
    • It must be natural and mutually beneficial to be effective
    • ?
  • How/What should we drive for collaboration with projects outside LFN that would be beneficial?
    • OSS (examples:  CNCF, LF Edge, Hyperledger, Openstack, ONF, etc.)
      • CNCF, OpenStack, LFEdge (Akraino, ...)
      • ?
    • SDO (examples: O-RAN, ETSI NFV, GSMA, 3GPP, ETSI ZSM, etc.)
      • GSMA
      • ?
    • Other? 

5. Would a more integrated solution approach increase or accelerate a more effective adoption of LFN technologies?

  • question needs clarification


6. The LFN TAC made recommendations on increased efficiencies for LFN project infrastructure. (Link:  Infrastructure Working Group Summary Report)  Are there other areas of project operations that you would like to see the TAC look into?

  • ?

7. Is commercial compliance (OVP) relevant to your project? y/n 

  • If yes then how does your project plan on contributing?
  • Yes, we developed OVP and are contributing to LFN level compliance

8. Do you have an activity lifecycle framework within your project? y/n

  • If yes, do you feel it is benefiting the project?
    • Yes. No real benefit at project level
  • If  no, do you feel that formalizing one is necessary?

9. Does your project need help to focus on highest priorities?

  • Yes, need to attract more devlopers

10. Is there a question that we missed that we should have asked but didn't?

  • ???






  • No labels