Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Frank Brockners

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Unknown User (rpaik)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Target size of the TSC (same as today/smaller/larger)?
  • Evolutionary approach (step by step evolve from platinum member representatives to elected members) or step function (elect an entirely meritocratic TSC in a single go)?
  • In case an evolutionary approach is considered - potential options:
    • (a) (in case the target TSC is smaller than the current one): we define a target number of TSC members and whenever s TSC member steps down, we won't pick a new member until we reach the target number
    • (b) (in case we stay with the current size) whenever a TSC member steps down, s/he'll pick a community member to replace him/her
    • (c) (in case we stay with the current size) we stay at the current number, and whenever a TSC member steps down, we'll trigger an election to choose a new TSC member
  • Constituents who are eligible to run & vote in TSC elections (right now it's just committers)
  • ...