Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Scot Steele (AT&T)
  2. David McBride
  3. Karine Sevilla (Orange)
  4. Luc Provoost
  5. Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)
  6. Toshiyasu Wakayama (KDDI)

Agenda


TimeTopicPresentersMinutes
5min

Meeting Administration

  •  Linux Foundation Anti-trust Policy
  •  Recording
  •  Agenda Bashing
  •  Attendance/Quorum (13/15)
  •  Approval of previous meeting minutes:  2021-01-12 TSC Agenda and Minutes
Co-Chairs
  • Minutes of last week's meeting approved.
5 min

Announcements


  • Goal is to have draft agenda ready by  
25 min
  •  Operation of Workstreams/projects within Anuket 
  •  Anuket wiki presence 
  •  TSC Operation: LFN Governance and Charter
    • 7 ways we interact with LFN Governing Board (TAC, SPC, Budget, Event Planning, Readouts, MAC, Dev Rep.: currently Cedric Ollivier )
    • Charter was "inherited" from OPNFV's 2020 revision - but can be revised of course.
  •  Operational Guidelines - Feedback needed. Volunteers to Edit.
  • Developer representative to the LFN GB
  • TSC operations procedures (OPNFV)
  • Editable Anuket Operations Procedures
  • Charter:
    • Updates: Anyone can create a suggestion for updates to the Anuket charter (change requests would be reviewed and voted on by the TSC (2/3 vote), and will also go through a legal check). See also section 8 in the current charter.
    • Potential need for updates: Charter is (due to OPNFV heritage) more focused on code contributions. It might be desirable to reword the charter to reflect "code" on par with "specifications".
  • Heather notes that the charter is mostly a legal document. She encourages to update the TSC procedures and operational procedure to better reflect the different work procedures and work products of Anuket.
10minPTLs/Co-Chairs
  • Moon status provided by Philippe Calvet

https://github.com/opnfv/moon

https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.policy/ussuri/admin/policy-json-file.html

Why we did Moon ?

  • Openstack was designed for those building a cloud infra, while telco cloud requires security configuration for the security administrator,  thus the need of Moon, a security policy engine that allows fine grained control under the supervision of security administrator,
  • Orange based its first version of telco cloud based an OpenStack release where security policy are managed by policy files that are depending on each Openstack module  aka .json policy ( = complex configurations)
  • The rationale for Moon : have a global security policy management plane, that could unify the security  of the various Openstack modules ( fully tested on Nova, and partially on Neutron , Cinder, Swift ) , and historically  Opendaylight
  • Moon helps addressing requirements from security authorities in virtualized environments  

What are the contributions to other communities ?

  • Orange with Openstack community added the concept of Identity/Keystone hook that allows from a .json policy file to interrogate through an API call an external policy decision point (aka Moon) that authorizes the requests based on a given security policy ( E.g allow or not the start of VM )

Why we republish Moon in 2020 ?

  • The initial contribution was initially linked with OPNFV . We redesign it internally to make as more an independent component and contributed the work in 2020 , this resulted in a major commit last year.
  • We also completey redesign the web interface to allow a security administrator within a telco to authorize certains commands through a simple user interface ( instead of CLI ) , and repackage the service as two libraries that could be easily integrated in any virtualized platform (in the micro-services spirit).
  • Moon was used in an experiment by one Orange Affiliate  to distinguish administrator roles depending of the status of the platform : design/maintenance status versus run status . As a consequence, this has been added to our recommendations.

What are next plans ?

  • Cover next generation telco cloud requirements : Extend Moon to manage dual environments like K8S and Openstack, and extend GUI to simplify policy generations.

Reference :

20 min
  •  Elbrus Release - Important Dates
    • Content freeze: Jan/15
    • Proof-reading freeze: Jan/22
    • RC: Jan/26
    • Candidate sign-off date: Jan/29

Walter Kozlowski + WS Leads


10 min
  •  Monday Technical Discussion follow-up
    •   Qiao Fu  to discuss the options in which PDF 2.0 frame work should be done with the TSC
      • (Pharos, new Anuket project, RI[12] or something else)

Defer to  

5 min
  •  Continue Release process discussions, Goals and Management
    • Should specification and conformance streams operate independently or integrated?
    • What should the Release cadence be?
    • Artifacts to be included (#agree, hold-over from meld)

Anuket Release Process Issues and Objectives r1.pdf

David McBride

Defer to  

5 min

OPNFV and CNTT mailing lists are being deprecated (date: TBD - target:  )

Request new "foo@lists.anuket.io" from Jim

5 min
  •  Next steps; high priorities:
    •  ANUKET WIKI UPDATES — BEFORE JAN 27 Announcement  – MUST DO Before   For main pages !!!!
EVERYONE!
5 min
  •  

    Status Updates

    •  Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade status
    •  LF IT/Infra update: (Aric GardnerTrevor Bramwell)
    •  gitlab POC


...